• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MENTOR TEXAS MEDIUM HEIGHT TE 650CC; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MENTOR TEXAS MEDIUM HEIGHT TE 650CC; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3548215
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Seroma (2069)
Date of Event 06/30/2014
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #: (b)(4).No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the no lot number was provided by the customer.
 
Event or Problem Description
Event description: this complaint is from a literature source.As reported in the literature publication entitled, "local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer.Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery." a (b)(6) female patient who underwent expander-based reconstruction (ebr) in two stages has experienced seroma.Objectives: this study investigated the factors that could lead to major or minor complications after expander- based versus direct-to-implant (dti) reconstruction.Methods: the studied factors were age, body mass index (bmi), hypertension, smoking, diabetes, type of mastectomy (nipple-sparing/total), implant size, neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.The study sample included 294 immediate reconstructions over 3 years.The primary outcome was the incidence of complications, major or minor depending on the necessity of revision surgery.For the dti pocket, we applied a variant of the conventional submuscular technique.The study population comprised 262 women undergoing 294 immediate reconstructions after mastectomy (32 bilateral cases) at (b)(6) from december 2011 to june 2014.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDIUM HEIGHT TE 650CC
Common Device Name
EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
MDR Report Key8335455
Report Number1645337-2019-08333
Device Sequence Number154965
Product Code LCJ
UDI-Device Identifier00081317006565
UDI-Public00081317006565
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source foreign,literature
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/25/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number3548215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/25/2019
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/13/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
-
-