| Model Number |
G21975 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
01/21/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Cook ireland ltd (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi)(importer).Exemption number: e2016031.Information pertaining to section g.1 as follows: importer site contact and address: (b)(4) cook medical incorporated (cmi) 1025 acuff road p.O box 4195 bloomington indiana 47402-4195.Importer site establishment registration number: 3005580113.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Dr.(b)(6) has placed our stents before; this time he could not place the stent as one part of the stent got kinked/broken.The stent to be returned back asap.Fda mdr reporting required - event is fda mdr reportable based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of ¿stent kinked/bent¿.No adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occurring.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(6) has placed our stents before, this time he could not place the sent as one part of the stent got kinked./ broken.The stent to be returned back asap.Fda mdr reporting required - event is fda mdr reportable based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of ¿stent kinked/bent¿.No adverse effects to the patient have been reported as occurring.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Cook ireland ltd (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi)(importer).Exemption number: e2016031.Information pertaining (b)(4).Importer site establishment registration number: (b)(4).Device evaluation the zso-10-5 device of lot number c1198946 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, with the original packaging.The packaging was open on receipt.With the information provided, a physical examination and document based investigation was conducted.Lab evaluation the device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on the (b)(6) 2019.A kink was observed at the 03rd porthole at the tapered end of the stent and at the 05th porthole at the non-tapered end of the stent.A 0.035¿ wire guide passed the kink at the 03rd porthole with resistance but could not pass the kink at the 05th porthole.Document review prior to distribution zso-10-5 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for zso-10-5 of lot number c1198946 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The review of relevant manufacturing records, confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred with the current lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1198946.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0045-6) states the following: ¿visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If any abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use.¿ ¿care must be exercised when straightening the pigtail curls in order to avoid kinking or breaking the stent.¿ the product manager has been notified of this user error event and has been asked to consider retraining at the facility as a result.Root cause review a definitive root cause could not be determined as the circumstances of use cannot be replicated in the laboratory.A possible root cause could be attributed to the use of a non-recommended wire guide with the device.It may be noted the device label indicates a 0.035¿ wire guide for use with this device and all simulated use testing to date has been completed using a 0.035¿ wire guide.As the smaller diameter 0.025¿ wire guide occupies less space in the lumen of the pigtail stent it is likely that the extent of the curvature of the pigtail will be greater when a 0.025.As per additional information received the user used a 0.025" wire guide.Summary complaint is confirmed as the failure was verified in the laboratory.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|