|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Fatigue (1849); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Pain (1994); Depression (2361); Bowel Perforation (2668); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Catalog# is unknown but referred to as cook celect filter.Occupation: non-healthcare professional.(b)(4).Summary of investigational findings: it has not been possible to investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating ¿celect filter - ivc perforation touching duodenum and pericaval fat." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.
|
|
Event Description
|
Description of event according to categorization form: it is alleged that "[pt] received a cook celect filter on (b)(6) 2011".[pt] alleges: "ivc filter extending outside of the ivc and touching the duodenum and pericaval fat".Physician has not recommended removal, and removal has not been attempted.Patient outcome: future removal is not planned.[pt] alleges "chronic leg pain diagnosed (b)(6) 2016".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Exemption number: e2016032.William cook (b)(4) (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Manufacturers ref#: (b)(4).Mfr site: name and address for importer site: (b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2011 via the right common femoral vein due to pulmonary embolism.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information provided at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation ¿ investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Per quality engineering review, the additional information provided for this complaint does not change the previous investigation conclusion.Therefore, no new investigation activities will be conducted at this time.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable, or unchanged.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: embedment, depression, anxiety.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The additional information regarding embedment does not change the previous investigation results for organ/vena cava perforation.Unknown if the reported depression and anxiety are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged filter is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient allegedly received an implant (b)(6) 2011 due to gastric bypass.The patient alleges embedment, depression, and anxiety.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient allegedly received an implant (b)(6) 2011 due to gastric bypass complication, cut into spleen, and nicked pancreas.The patient alleges vena cava and organ perforation, device is unable to be retrieved.The patient further alleges chest/side pains, hard to breath, limited activity, and tiresome.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: unable to remove, chest/side pains, hard to breathe, limited activity, tiresome.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up.The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up.Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered.Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated.Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e.G., a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications the filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever.Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques.The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position.The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established.Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.Unknown if the reported hard to breathe, limited activity, and "tiresome" are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged filter is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|