Catalog Number B1080-020 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Rupture (1546); Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/23/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a calcified and restenosed lesion in the iliac artery.Resistance advancing an 8x20mm armada 35 balloon catheter was felt with the calcification.During inflation, the balloon ruptured at an unknown pressure.Resistance was felt with the anatomy during removal and the tip separated due to force applied.The separated tip was removed with a lasso.There were no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the previously filed reported, additional information received: the balloon ruptured at nominal pressure during the first inflation.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number: (b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture and separation was confirmed.The difficulty removing was not tested due to the condition of the device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties and subsequent patient effects were due to case circumstances.It is likely that the resistance noted during advancement and balloon rupture were due to interaction with the calcification.The difficulty removing, separation, and additional treatment to remove the separated portion were due to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|