| Model Number |
500-55150 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/25/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The complaint catheter was returned for evaluation.On 01 feb 2019, the evaluation confirmed the msd fracture reported.The msd was fractured at two locations, approximately 64.4cm and 72.3cm.The fractured ends show that the msd was severely bent.The tubing shows signs of multiple pinch marks ranging from 42.6cm to the msd connector.A review of the device history record confirmed that the product was manufactured per standard processes and met all acceptance criteria.There have been no other reported complaints from msds of the same lot.No patient harm was reported.The ifu warns the user to not advance if resistance is met.Excessive force against resistance may result in damage to the device or vasculature.This device malfunction was due to user error.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient with a peripheral arterial occlusion was treated with ekos (s/n: (b)(4)) on (b)(6) 2019.While advancing the msd during placement, resistance was felt.The physician pulled the msd out, reflushed the wire lumen and then attempted to advance the msd again.Resistance was very significant and the msd kinked.The physician decided to remove it.Upon removal, the proximal end of the msd was broken.There was a lot of the msd still within the iddc.The physician cut the iddc right at the strain relief to expose the wire lumen and pulled out the msd the physician was able to maintain access and start over with another 0.035" wire through the cut ekos lumen to maintain position.He then removed the iddc and placed a cragg-mcnamara over the wire and into position.The patient was reported to be stable and slept through the procedure.No pieces were lost in the patient, the fractured mds section was removed successfully.The patient was being transferred to icu for lytic therapy.The device was returned for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|