|
An event regarding infection involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event of infection was not confirmed, however wear was confirmed based on material analysis of the returned device.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 19 march 2019 which indicated: damage was observed on the insert condyles, consistent with contact against the femoral component.Backside impression markings were observed on distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Damage consistent with the explantation process was also observed on the insert.Delamination, burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the insert condyles.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.The material analysis report concluded: damage was observed on the femoral component and baseplate, consistent with contact against each other.Delamination, burnishing, scratches and third-body indentations were observed on the tibial insert condyles.Additionally, burnishing, scratching and third body indentations were observed on the patella insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Backside impression markings were observed on distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant stated the following comment: provided x-ray confirms a subluxated femoral component.Need operative reports, clinical/office notes, histopathology reports, and serial x-rays.-product history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot or sterile lot referenced.Conclusion: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), dated 19 march 2019 which indicated: damage was observed on the insert condyles, consistent with contact against the femoral component.Backside impression markings were observed on distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Damage consistent with the explantation process was also observed on the insert.Delamination, burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the insert condyles.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.The material analysis report concluded: damage was observed on the femoral component and baseplate, consistent with contact against each other.Delamination, burnishing, scratches and third-body indentations were observed on the tibial insert condyles.Additionally, burnishing, scratching and third body indentations were observed on the patella insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Backside impression markings were observed on distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.The event of infection was not confirmed and root cause of infection or the wear observed could not be determined based on the information provided.Further information such as serial x-rays, operative reports, clinical/office notes as well as histopathology are required to complete the investigation for confirming the infection and determining a root cause for both issues identified.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|