|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GEN II CEMENTED TIBIAL B/PLATE SZ3 RIGHT; PROSTH, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONST, CEMENTED, POLY/METAL/POLY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
71420182 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
| Date of Event |
02/01/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed due to 2.5 years since implantation of the genesis ii ps primary knee replacement.Due to the insert ps peg having fractured and the whole polyethylene having dislocated the femoral component was articulating on the tibia and eroded the medial femoral condyle of the oxinium tkr component.The patient required a revision procedure to a legion revision prosthesis, maintaining the patella.During the revision procedure, it was discovered the ps post on the primary insert had broken and the knee subluxed posteriorly, which is thought to have caused the dislocation of the insert from the tibial baseplate.The knee was x-rayed and shown to be well located at follow-up of 12-18 months following the primary procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The affected genesis ii ps femoral component, genesis ii tibial baseplate and legion ps insert were returned and evaluated.The patellar component was not returned as it still implanted in the patient.However, device details were provided.The review of the manufacturing records for the listed batches did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.A review of complaint history on the listed parts revealed no prior complaints for the listed batch with the same failure mode.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A lab analysis conducted during this investigation on the returned devices indicated that the tibial baseplate showed burnishing on the proximal surfaces, as damage on the proximal surface of the posterior lock.Some bone and bone cement adhered to the bone contacting surface.The femoral component showed bone and bone cement adhesion to the bone contacting surface.Damage was observed on the edge of the bone contacting surface as well as on the articulating surface of the medial condyle.Our clinical evaluation noted that based on the images and information provided, the root cause of the ps post breakage cannot be definitively concluded although the reported event when the patient ¿twisted and thought she had dislocated her kneecap¿ could certainly be the contributing factor as symptoms appeared shortly afterwards.The length of time ambulating on the possibly dislocated and/or broken post prior to the revision likely contributed to the severity of the symptoms, wear debris, and ¿catastrophic failure¿.The patient impact beyond the reported symptoms after the ¿twisted¿ event and the revision procedure and post-op course cannot be concluded.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|