|
The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Visual inspection: the helical blade coupling screw (357.377) was received.Upon visual inspection, the device appeared to be worn out with consistent use and service.There were scratches found on the surface of the cap of the helical blade coupling screw due to repeated hammering.It is observed that there was damage on the alignment indicator and this would not allow coupling of helical blade coupling screw and helical blade inserter.The complaint condition is confirmed and consistent with the reported condition.Functional test: the helical blade coupling screw could not be able to couple with the helical blade inserter due to the post manufacturing damage of the alignment indicator.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection of the helical blade coupling screw cannot be performed due to the post manufacturing damage.Dhr review: no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Conclusion: a device history record (dhr) review, visual inspection, and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.The complaint condition is confirmed as the helical blade inserter (357.372) was not coupling with the helical blade coupling screw (357.377).There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: part # 357.377, synthes lot # 6606044, supplier lot # 6606044, release to warehouse date: 05 may 2011, supplier: isimac machine company.No ncr's were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|