|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coils and a ruby coil detachment handle (handle).During the procedure, the physician successfully detached two ruby coils in the target vessel using the handle.When attempting to detach the third ruby coil using the handle, the ruby coil could not be detached.The ruby coil was therefore removed and was not used in the procedure.The procedure was completed using two additional ruby coils and the same handle.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Results: the pet lock was broken and pull tube was retracted on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.Bends and kinks were present approximately 1.5 cm, 4.5 cm, 19.5 cm, 24.0 cm, 28.5 cm, 43.5 cm, 46.5 cm, 50.5 cm, 58.0 cm, 59.0 cm, 77.0 cm, 85.0 cm and 94.0 cm from the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly with a fractured stretch resistant wire (sr wire) and the proximal constraint sphere was within the distal detachment tip (ddt).The embolization coil had offset coil winds throughout the coil.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed a detached embolization coil.The embolization coil was detached due to the stretch resistant (sr) wire being fractured; however, the proximal constraint sphere was intact with the distal detachment tip (ddt) of the pusher assembly and was stuck due to an unknown substance.The pet lock was broken and pull wire was retracted indicating the handle performed as intended; therefore, the unknown substance holding the proximal constraint sphere in the ddt was determined to be the cause of the coil not detaching during the procedure.The embolization coil damage, including the sr component fracture, is likely due to the device being returned unprotected by the introducer sheath and is incidental to the reported complaint.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|