|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR CPX 4 BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER WITH SUTURE TABS; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
3549113 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Since no lot number was provided, no manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review could be performed.(b)(6).Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a female patient of unknown age underwent a primary breast augmentation with a saline mentor cpx 4 breast tissue expander with suture tabs 450cc and experienced deflation on unknown side breast implant.As a result, the patient underwent removal and replacement with a new tissue expander of unknown type on unknown date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 3/26/2019, the mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 4/25/2019, mentor became aware that the following information were erroneously excluded from the supplemental report sent on 4/24/2019: patient date of birth of (b)(6) 1974, patient's age at the time of event was 44, patient was a female, and date of implant explantation of (b)(6) 2019.On 4/24/2019, via product's diagram, mentor became aware of the device's lot number: 7379326.On 4/29/2019, a manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed for the complaint device.As a result, the manufacturing date and expiration date fields have been updated.The manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.On 4/29/2019, the product investigation was completed.Device investigation summary: upon receipt by mentor, the device contained brown fluid.No foreign material was observed within the device or on the shell surface.During initial evaluation the device appeared intact.Leak testing was performed according with mentor procedures and it revealed a rupture on the posterior aspect, measuring approximately 0.4 cm.Microscopic examination was performed.No evidence of instrument damage was observed.No other anomalies were observed.Deflation complaint was confirmed.Mentor products are 100% visually inspected prior to release in addition to thorough in-process testing during several stages of the manufacturing process.Mentor product analysis lab concluded that the rent occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.The complaint was confirmed since a rupture was found on the device.Nonetheless, a microscopic examination of the edges of the rent was performed and it did not provide conclusive evidence of what could be the root cause.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|