• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209999
Device Problems Computer Software Problem (1112); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/25/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of the normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
After all cuts were made robotically, cuts were not accurate enough to press fit the femur.Distal cut was passed over twice, as it is done on each mako case.All green was resected and no cuts were deep on the mako guidance module monitor, however, there were gaps present when trialing.Cement was needed to place the final implant and dr was very upset and said that he can do better manually.16-30 minutes surgical delay.Case type: tka.What is the estimated discrepancy based on the plan, mentioned in the complaint? as per the mps: in general, there were gaps when placing the implant.Most prominent was the anterior chamfer.Distal cut was successfully cut to plan and posterior cuts were not made deep.
 
Event Description
After all cuts were made robotically, cuts were not accurate enough to press fit the femur.Distal cut was passed over twice, as it is done on each mako case.All green was resected and no cuts were deep on the mako guidance module monitor, however, there were gaps present when trialing.Cement was needed to place the final implant and dr was very upset and said that he can do better manually.16-30 minutes surgical delay case type: tka.What is the estimated discrepancy based on the plan, mentioned in the complaint? as per the mps: in general, there were gaps when placing the implant.Most prominent was the anterior chamfer.Distal cut was successfully cut to plan and posterior cuts were not made deep.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up #1 and final report submitted to update sections d.3, g.1, g.4, g.7, h.2, h.3, h.6, h.10 and h.11 based on the results of investigation.Reported event: an event regarding inaccurate resection and poor trial fit during a total knee procedure involving 3.0 rio robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.Method & results: -device history review: a review of the dhr associated with rio 588 found quality inspection procedures successfully passed.-complaint history: based on the device identification (pn 209999) the complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding inaccurate resection and poor trial fit during a tka procedure.There was one other reported event for the listed catalog number ((b)(4)).-conclusion: the case files (patient session data and vplog data) were reviewed.An analysis of the application workflow, femur checkpoint values, femur registration values, rio registration and verification values, bone preparation checkpoints, burrlist and implant plan was completed.A comparison of the burrlist and the patient implant plan shows that the femoral resections were made according to the plan.All other areas of the investigation found error values within the accuracy tolerance region.No system defect or malfunction is suspected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key8392078
MDR Text Key138141476
Report Number3005985723-2019-00206
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/11/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/05/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/30/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-