Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.The reported failure could be confirmed from the visible striation marks on the trocar where it had cold welded with the sleeve.The location of the trocar interlocking pins is superior to the mating portion of the sleeve.If the pins are not seated within these groves then the trocar is spinning within the guide sleeve causing enough heat and friction to cause the welding of the two parts.Therefore, this type of failure has been attributed to user technique issue.A review into the mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any kind for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.A non-conformance search was performed to identify an non-conformance associated with this part-lot combination.No non-conformances were identified for this part-lot number (part: 210133, lot number: l188273) combination.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).This report is being filed from the (b)(4) as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|