• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Neck Pain (2433)
Event Date 02/05/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient was experiencing pain in the neck.Follow up was received indicating that the pain was extreme and was not associated with any injuries or seizure, although the patient's last seizure was in (b)(6) 2018 and the patient noted that she may have hit her face during the seizure.It was noted that the patient had not had any recent changes in medication.Per the physician, the patient's device had been programmed off.The pain had become mild and her neck was sore at the lead location.Diagnostics were within normal limits.Settings were adjusted to mitigate the painful stimulation.It was stated that the patient felt as if the nerve was irritated or sore likely due to the painful stimulation.The patient's device was then programmed on, initially to 0.75 ma.However, the patient could not tolerate the stimulation at this current.The settings were then reduced further and the patient was left at reduced settings and no other medical intervention was reported.An implant card was received indicating that the patient underwent a replacement surgery due to "unexplained neck pain".No additional, relevant information was received to date.No device was received for analysis.
 
Event Description
The device was returned for analysis.Analysis was completed for the returned device.Visual evaluation of the device found markings typical of surgical procedure.The septum appeared cored with no evidence of dried body fluid or corrosion in the connector blocks.Burn marks were also noted on the generator, and were most likely associated with electrocautery procedures.The set screw was not returned.There is damage to the underside of the septum.This is most likely associated with loosening of the set screw process during the explant procedure.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24 hours while the generator was placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the output signal.The device performed according to functional specifications.Analysis in the product analysis lab concluded proper functionality of the generator with no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition.No additional, relevant information was received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key8413663
MDR Text Key138570710
Report Number1644487-2019-00477
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/16/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/12/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/16/2016
Device Model Number102
Device Lot Number3996
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/22/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received03/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age24 YR
-
-