|
Method: x-ray, labelling review, and risk assessment.Visual inspection: screw was returned with disengaged tulip head.Deformation was observed on tulip head locking ring and on the head of screw shank.Functional inspection: could not be performed because the device was confirmed to be damaged during visual inspection.Dimensional inspection: not performed because there is no indication the event was related to dimensions of the device.Material analysis: material analysis was not performed as there is no indication the event was related to the material properties of the device.Device history records were reviewed and no relevant manufacturing issues were identified as all units met stryker specifications.It was confirmed via x-ray and visual inspection that the screw tulip disengaged post-operatively.It was reported that there were no complications during the initial surgery.Deformation of tulip head locking ring indicates that the screw shaft was pressing against deformed side of the tulip head likely due to over angulation on screw.Deformation on the screw shank also indicate over-angulation of the screw.Root cause of the reported event was determined to be patient fall and over angulation on screw.From surgical technique: the surgeon must warn the patient that the device cannot and does not replicate the flexibility, strength, reliability or durability of normal healthy bone, that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma, and that the device may need to be replaced in the future.If the patient is involved in an occupation or activity which applies inordinate stress upon the implant (e.G., substantial walking, running, lifting, or muscle strain) the surgeon must advise the patient that resultant forces can cause failure of the device.
|