| Catalog Number |
683G |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
02/20/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent dental flap surgery procedure on an (b)(6) 2019 and suture was used.It was reported that the needle was broken at the swage part during interrupted suturing on the gum.The swage part was not held.When pulling the suture after the suturing, the suture had been detached from the needle.No broken pieces of the needle were left inside the patient¿s body.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = > (b)(4).A manufacturing record review was performed for the finished device lot and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation summary: it was reported performance needle breakage.A failed suture needle was submitted for fractographic evaluation.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations in order to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.Mechanical damage observed coincidental to the fracture provides additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the attachment area of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.In order to avoid this kind of damage grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|