| Catalog Number |
3542440M |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
11/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At the time of this report, mentor has received no information regarding explantation or an expected explantation date.It is unknown at this time if the device will be made available for return.As a result, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Since no lot number was provided, no device history record (dhr) review could be performed.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) female underwent primary breast augmentation with a 275cc mentor siltex round spectrum saline prosthesis and experienced right sided deflation post procedure.At the time of this report, mentor has received no information regarding explantation or an expected explantation date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was received on (b)(6) 2019.The lot number has been provided and d7 has been updated.The device was explanted on (b)(6) 2019.A device history record review is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on 6/15/2019.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed for the finished device number (b)(4), and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint were identified.Device evaluation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that the patient experienced a deflation of the implant.During the evaluation of the sample, five (5) lines of shell wear were observed on the anterior aspect, suggesting in-vivo folding or creasing of the device.In addition during the leak testing a rupture measuring 0.4 cm was observed.Siltex cracking on the posterior aspect of the implant was noted.No other anomalies were observed.The second product received is a concomitant device, no further information is required.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Mentor believes that siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses caused by acute folds (i.E., severe ¿v¿ or tight folds) in the room temperature vulcanization (rtv) shell of siltex breast implants.The reported complaint was confirmed.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet.It should be noted that as part of our quality process, each device is visually inspected and functionally tested during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.Based on the information reported and/or the product investigation, there is no evidence that the issue is related with the manufacturing process.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|