|
Method: labeling and risk assessment.Results: the customer reported event of a screw main body fracture post op.The event resulted in no adverse consequences reported to the patient.It was reported that the screw was fractured on a patient x ray.No revision surgery has been planned.The device is still implanted and is not available at this time.No lot number was provided, so manufacturing review could not be completed.It is unknown if fusion occurred or if there were any complications during the original surgery.Stryker requested x-rays, surgical notes, and relevant patient information from the reporting physician but the information has not been provided.The initial surgery occurred in february 2018, meaning the device was implanted for a period of 1 year.Conclusion: there is not enough information provided to determine a root cause.If the device or more information becomes available in the future, this investigation will be reopened and updated accordingly.According to the xia ifu, "while the expected life of spinal implant components is difficult to estimate, it is finite.These components are made of foreign materials which are placed within the body for the potential fusion of the spine and reduction of pain.However, due to the many biological, mechanical and physicochemical factors which affect these devices but cannot be evaluated in vivo, the components cannot be expected to indefinitely withstand the activity level and loads of normal healthy bone.Bending, disassembly or fracture of any or all implant components.Fatigue fracture of spinal fixation devices, including screws and rods, has occurred." additionally, " in the event that healing is delayed, does not occur, or failure to immobilize the delayed/nonunion results, the implant will be subject to excessive and repeated stresses which can eventually cause loosening, bending or fatigue fracture.The degree or success of union, loads produced by weight bearing, and activity levels will, among other conditions, dictate the longevity of the implant.".
|