|
An event regarding baseplate loosening was reported, malposition of the triathlon femoral component was confirmed based on clinician review of the x-ray provided.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: damage was observed on the femoral component and baseplate, consistent with contact against each other.Delamination, burnishing, scratches and third-body indentations were observed on the insert condyles.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Debris was observed on the lateral condyle of the insert.Backside impression markings were observed on distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Eds showed the femoral component, baseplate and debris from the insert were all consistent with astm f75 alloy.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.-clinician review: a clinician review of the provided medical records states the following; provided undated x-ray confirms subluxated femoral component posteriorly.Need operative reports, clinical reports, histopathology reports, office notes, serial x-rays and examination of the explanted components.- product history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: no other similar events were reported for the lot indicated.Conclusions: a clinician review of the provided medical records states the following; provided undated x-ray confirms subluxated femoral component posteriorly.Need operative reports, clinical reports, histopathology reports, office notes, serial x-rays and examination of the explanted components.The device was returned and material analysis was performed which confirmed damage was observed on the femoral component and baseplate, consistent with contact against each other.Delamination, burnishing, scratches and third-body indentations were observed on the insert condyles.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Debris was observed on the lateral condyle of the insert.Backside impression markings were observed on distal surface of the insert, consistent with contact against the baseplate.Eds showed the femoral component, baseplate and debris from the insert were all consistent with astm f75 alloy.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, clinical reports, histopathology reports, office notes and serial x-rays are needed to fully investigate the event.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
It was reported that patient's left knee was revised.As reported by rep: ".Progressive pain, swelling, sense of unreliability.Ct and x-rays revealed tibial loosening.Soft tissue effusion, cell count (3,500) and synovasure worrisome for possible infection.Cultures negative to date".Update: a clinician review of the provided medical records states the following; provided undated x-ray confirms subluxated femoral component posteriorly.
|