|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown or unavailable investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and specifications of the device, as well as a visual inspection and dimensional verification, were conducted during the investigation.The dilator and sheath combination was returned to cook for investigation.The visual inspection of the complaint device showed no biomatter along the surface of either device.It appeared that the flare of the sheath was pulled through the hub, as the flare was intact but out of round.The sheath and dilator hub remained connected and could not be separated.Dimensions relevant to the reported failure mode were analyzed and confirmed that the device was manufactured within cook¿s specifications.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed for lot 9126841.No non-conformances relevant to the failure mode were found.A software search for complaints on the reported lot found no additional complaints from the field.As there are adequate inspection activities in place, objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, no related non-conformances, and no other lot related complaints received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field based on the information provided, examination of returned product, and results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a random component failure contributed to this incident.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Correction - this mdr is being submitted to indicate the event is not reportable.Upon further review, it was determined that this event is not reportable per 21cfr part 803.50 as it does not meet the criteria for a death, serious injury or reportable product malfunction.A review of reporting software revealed there are no previous incidents of hub separation of the rssw sheath that lead to a death or serious injury.Additionally review of risk documentation indicated that this malfunction is not likely to cause serious injury if it were to reoccur.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|