| Catalog Number |
SXPP1A200 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: confirm if suture pdp740d reported to have any quality issue pre-op, intra-op or post-op? unknown.Confirm which suture was noticed to be broken inside the patient body, post-op initial procedure? pdp740d or sxpp1a200 or both? unknown.Since reoperation has not been done, it is unknown whether pdp740d or sxpp1a200 or both suture was broken.Suspected suture breakage.If both then please create additional ip for suture pdp740d - correspond.What was done to manage or treat the dehiscence and wound opening? no additional treatment is performed.Any medical/surgical intervention performed on patient or planned at a later date? there is no plan to reoperate, because there is a fear of infection.Was the opened wound re-sutured? no.Was the patient re-admitted to hospital? suture breakage and wound dehiscence were suspected during hospitalization.Currently in hospital.Was a wound-vac prescribed/used on patient? unknown.No further information will be provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Which tissue layer was the pds plus and the stratafix used? were both the pds plus and the stratafix suspected to be broken? is there a plan to confirm/verify if the suture/s are indeed broken? are the patient¿s regular visits done to address/treat the reported events? if yes, what interventions are done during these hospital visits to address the reported events? is the event of wound opened also a suspected event or an actual event? have the reported events resulted in impairment of function or restricted movement?.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a total knee arthroplasty on an unknown date and a barbed suture was used.Six weeks following the procedure, a dehiscence occurred.The suture seemed to be broken at the inside of the vastus medialis, and the wound was opened in the patient¿s body.The patient could not extend his knee firmly.There was a dent on the upper edge of the patella.The surface layer of the skin was not dehisced.There was a possibility that the suture was broken inside the body, but it could not be confirmed by mri due to halation.No additional treatment was performed.Since reoperation has not been done, it is unknown one or both suture was broken.There is no plan to re-operate, because there is a fear of infection.The patient was currently reported as being in the hospital.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.Additional information has been requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).An unopened sample of product code sxpp1a200, lot lmz412 was returned for analysis.During the visual inspection of the sample, no defects were found on the package.The sample was opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The suture was dispensed without problem and examined along of the strand and no defects, damaged or suture breakage were noted.A functional test was performed and the tensile strength force was above the minimum requirement.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.Per the condition of the representative sample, no breakage of suture post-op was found and the tested sample met the finished goods requirements.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: which tissue layer was the pds plus and the stratafix used? on the muscle layer.Were both the pds plus and the stratafix suspected to be broken? unknown.Is there a plan to confirm/verify if the suture/s are indeed broken? no.Are the patient¿s regular visits done to address/treat the reported events? if yes, what interventions are done during these hospital visits to address the reported events? the doctor has no plans to take action.Is the event of wound opened also a suspected event or an actual event? suspected event.Have the reported events resulted in impairment of function or restricted movement? the patient cannot extend his knee firmly.I'm sorry for late reply and no further information will be provided.Note: event related to pds plus suture reported via 2210968-2019-80577.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|