|
Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4).A review of the device history records has been requested.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Part: 02.110.150; lot: h203872; part manufacture date: october 19, 2016; manufacturing location: elmira; part expiration date: n/a; nonconformance noted: n/a.A review of the device history record (dhr) revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of lcp wrist fusion standard bend plate product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework nor nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no nonconformance noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Investigation: the implant was not returned and instead investigation will be done based on the supplied images.The images (2 total) were reviewed and the complaint condition for broken could be confirmed as the images showed that the implant broke along the middle.As the implant was not returned, an as received, dimensional, material or drawing reviews are not applicable.A device history review was performed for the returned instrument¿s lot number, and no nonconformance reports (ncrs), no material review reports (mrrs), or complaint-related issues were identified with the lot number which may have contributed to the complaint condition.No definitive root cause was able to be determined as the circumstances surrounding the event are unknown.During the investigation, no unidentified product design/manufacturing issues or discrepancies were observed (based on the images) that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Risk document review was completed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|