• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG PRIMARY HEMI MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION PLATE, LEFT, 5+17-HOLES, WITH TEMPLATE; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG PRIMARY HEMI MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION PLATE, LEFT, 5+17-HOLES, WITH TEMPLATE; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number 55-15922
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); No Information (3190)
Event Date 03/14/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not available for evaluation.If additional information is received it will be reported on a supplemental report.Device is implanted in patient.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a health care professional that a patient's x-ray revealed a broken implant plate.There is no information available on how the plate broke or whether revision surgery is planned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: the actual device was returned for evaluation when initially it was indicated that it would not be returned.Investigation results: the investigation results show that the postoperative plate fracture occurred through a fixing hole, so the reported event could be confirmed.The (measurable) dimensions of the returned plate are in accordance with the specifications.The chemical composition conforms to the specification of ti grade 2.The macroscopic appearance points to exceeding the material strength.That is confirmed by the deteriora-tion of the anodization layer and the changes of the surface¿s structure in the area of the breakage.The fracture surface was partially leveled due to friction with the counterpart.The non-destroyed fracture surface (rest) shows the appearance of a forced rupture.The fractographic investigation with sem shows a structure of a ductile forced rupture with secondary cracks and in addition, swinging lines of a fatigue breakage are visible.In comparison to the straight reference line the plate was bent through a fixing hole.All relevant quality documents (manufacturing and inspection documents) have been reviewed.The device history record for article# 55-15922 and lot/batch code# 1000288707 indicates 26 devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock on 2018-jan-23.No issues could be found in the manufacturing or inspection documents.To obtain more details about the complained event, the sales rep was contacted.On the provided x-ray, the affected fixing hole shows no inserted screw and is placed in the area between the new inserted fibula graft and the remaining part of the ramus (s.Fig.21).The provided complaint information (e.G.X-ray) was forwarded to the stryker health care professional, who stated the following: ¿(¿) the fibula graft is not a ¿micro vascular¿ bone graft, and there is a large gap between the fibula graft and the ramus.This gap does not meet the criteria for primary reconstruction and therefore a secondary recon plate (stronger) should have been used.(¿)¿.The plate broke postoperatively because of an overload supported by the large gap, which indicates an off label use.Due to the breakage of the plate, each fracture part has sharp edges that may cut through the skin.Therefore, extrusion can be a result of a postoperative plate breakage.According to stryker cmf¿s senior specialist clinical affairs ¿ clinical research: ¿(¿) possible other factors leading to this issue include but are not limited to sharp plate edges resulting from modifications of the product by the surgeon, perioperative radiation of cancer patients and insufficient soft tissue coverage of the implant.The performed perioperative radiation in the current case may also have influenced the occurrence of extrusion.(¿)¿.Based on the investigation and the corresponding statistical evaluation there is no indication for an incorrectly working product or any systematic design, material or manufacturing related issue.Therefore, no further corrective and / or preventive actions are deemed necessary at this time.The complaint is added to the complaint trend.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a health care professional that a patient's x-ray revealed a broken implant plate.There is no information available on how the plate broke or whether revision surgery is planned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRIMARY HEMI MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION PLATE, LEFT, 5+17-HOLES, WITH TEMPLATE
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG
boetzingerstr. 41
freiburg D-791 11
DE  D-79111
MDR Report Key8438185
MDR Text Key139699014
Report Number0008010177-2019-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JEY
UDI-Device Identifier04546540356406
UDI-Public04546540356406
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K014263
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/31/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
2 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number55-15922
Device Catalogue Number55-15922
Device Lot Number1000288707
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/21/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/14/2019
Initial Date FDA Received03/20/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/14/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/31/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number0
-
-