(b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history could not be conducted because the lot number was not provided.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect(s), and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2014, the patient was hospitalized for chest pain.On (b)(6) 2014, coronary angiography showed 90% stenosis of the mid left anterior descending (lad) coronary artery.A 2.5x33mm xience xpedition stent and a 3.0x38mm xience xpedition stent were then implanted in the mid lad.The patient was later discharged from the hospital on (b)(6) 2014.On (b)(6) 2018, the patient was hospitalized for dizziness.Unspecified medication was given; however, coronary angiography and ct were not performed, and the original stent status is unknown.The patient was in good condition and was discharged from the hospital on (b)(6) 2018.There were no adverse patient effects, and there was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.Reportedly, the relationship between the event and the device cannot be determined.No additional information was provided.
|