|
A technical investigation of the product failure was initiated including engineering analysis on the returned deflated balloon.Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscope (sem) images were obtained for the deflated balloon and an opening was observed.The initial investigation suggests that the preliminary root cause of the deflation was likely due to a manufacturing defect.Deflation is a known risk, the frequency of balloon deflations has not exceeded the frequency identified in the labeling.Obalon's labeling addresses the reported event with warnings for monitoring patients for deflation symptoms.The device labeling states, "patients reporting a loss of fullness, increased hunger, and/or weight gain should be examined by radiograph, as this may be a sign of balloon deflation.Additionally, any increase in nausea, vomiting and/or cramping after initial symptoms have subsided may indicate a deflated balloon.Patients should be evaluated by radiograph and endoscopic visualization might be required if the state of inflation cannot be determined radiographically.In the event of balloon deflation, the balloon should be removed as soon as possible." and "it is expected for patients to experience some degree of nausea, vomiting, and cramping within the first week after each balloon administration.Severe symptoms during that time or new symptoms occurring after the first week could indicate a premature balloon deflation.A sudden loss of fullness or a sudden increase in feelings of hunger may also indicate a potential balloon deflation.In these circumstances, radiographic imaging should be considered to rule out a potential balloon deflation.Balloon valves are radiopaque and the outline of an inflated balloon will have an elliptical or circular perimeter.If all balloons cannot be visualized with a single x-ray view, a second x-ray view should also be evaluated.".
|
|
Medical records for this event were obtained which documented that the patient presented to an ed on (b)(6) 2019 with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, rectal bleeding, and hematemesis.All balloons were endoscopically removed and one balloon was identified as deflated and located close to the antrum.A 2 cm clean-based ulcer was noted at the pyloric channel with no signs of bleeding.Gastritis was observed during the endoscopy and gastric biopsies were taken with pathology report results documented as reactive superficial mucosal hyperplasia and as negative for helicobacter pylori.Administration records for this patient were also obtained which documented that the patient had three balloons implanted with a first balloon placement of (b)(6) 2018, second balloon placement of (b)(6) 2018, and third balloon placement of (b)(6) 2018 and that the balloon inflation pressures were recorded as within the labeled pressure range at implantation.Based on the records it was determined that the deflated balloon was the second balloon placed which was implanted for 100 days.
|