Catalog Number 1550225-23 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Advance (2524); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204)
|
Event Date 02/28/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant medical products: guide wire: asahi grandslam; guideliner: godzilla; stent: boston synergy.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the mid circumflex coronary artery with moderate tortuosity and moderate calcification.A 2.25 x 23 mm xience sierra stent delivery system was advanced; however, could not cross the lesion due to meeting resistance with a previously crushed stent in the proximal circumflex artery.On attempting to remove the sds, resistance with a non-abbott guide catheter extension, a guide catheter and the anatomy was met and the stent dislodged.An unspecified trek balloon dilatation catheter was advanced to crush the stent into the vessel wall.The tip of a non-abbott guide wire became trapped behind the crushed stent and when the guide wire was attempted to be removed with no reported force, a tip separation occurred.A non-abbott stent was deployed to embed the dislodged stent further into the vessel wall and trap the tip of the separated guide wire.The procedure was completed with the successful deployment of a 2.5 x 18 mm xience sierra stent at the target lesion.Intra- procedure echo was completed and results indicated the patient had an echo ejection fraction of 50-55% and a trace to small inferior lateral pericardial effusion.The physician deemed that the pericardial effusion was not related to the procedure.The patient was reported to be doing well post procedure.User facility medwatch report received that states: when attempting to deploy stent in the patient the stent came off of the catheter and attached to old stent struts that were previously placed and in the patient.Stent in patient.However, not deployed.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number: (b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported stent dislodgement was confirmed.The reported failure to advance the device, difficulty to remove (anatomy) and device damaged by another were unable to be replicated in a testing environment as they are based on operational circumstances.The reported difficulty to remove (guiding catheter) could not be confirmed due to the condition the device was returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties and treatment appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely the device interacted with the previously crushed stent causing the reported failure to advance.During removal the device interacted with the difficult anatomy, guide catheter extension, and guiding catheter causing the reported difficulty to remove and subsequent stent dislodgement.A balloon catheter was advanced to crush the dislodged stent; however, the guide wire interacted with the stent and the guide wire tip detached causing the reported device damaged by another.The device was successfully crushed into the vessel wall resulting in the patient effects of device embedded and additional therapy/non-surgical treatment.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|