After making cuts, anterior-lateral gapping between implant and bone was identified.Case was finished with no patient harms auto arm accuracy test was done following case in which the robot successfully passed.I am requesting an investigation be completed for dr (b)(6) on why this situation could have occurred.Case type: tka.What is the estimated gap discrepancy pertaining to the anterior resection plane? as per the mps: 2mm gap discrepancy between planned vs outcome.No gaps in other resection planes.How was the 2mm anterior-lateral gapping between implant and bone measured, was a measurement device used? as per the mps: the gap was determined by the surgeon using a small white measuring tape, and the gap was consistent both med.And lat.
|
After making cuts, anterior-lateral gapping between implant and bone was identified.Case was finished with no patient harms auto arm accuracy test was done following case in which the robot successfully passed.I am requesting an investigation be completed for dr (b)(6) on why this situation could have occurred.Case type: tka.What is the estimated gap discrepancy pertaining to the anterior resection plane? as per the mps: 2mm gap discrepancy between planned vs outcome.No gaps in other resection planes.How was the 2mm anterior-lateral gapping between implant and bone measured, was a measurement device used? as per the mps: the gap was determined by the surgeon using a small white measuring tape, and the gap was consistent both med.And lat.
|
Reported event: an event regarding inaccurate resection during a total knee procedure involving 3.0 rio robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.Method & results: device history review: a review of the dhr associated with rio 704 found quality inspection procedures successfully passed.Complaint history: based on the device identification (pn 209999) the complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding inaccurate resection during a tka procedure.There was one other reported event for the listed catalog number (pr 1537088, pr1419895, pr1427242, pr1440996, pr1407370, pr1419895, pr1427242, pr1433496, pr1443555, pr 1449671, pr1516994, pr1528344, pr 1549560, pr 1748126, pr 1765984, pr 1757777, pr 1748590, pr1910116, pr1910115, pr1973447, pr1999340, pr2007557, pr2027239 and pr1940380).Conclusion: an analysis of the warnings in the crisis log file, application workflow, implant plan, femur checkpoint values, femur registration values, rio registration and verification values, bone preparation checkpoint values, and cutting tool location was completed.No system defect or malfunction is suspected.
|