|
No patient information was provided by the complainant.No further remedial action/ corrective action/ preventive action/ field safety corrective action is required, as it is questionable why the surgeon spend extra effort to disconnect the instrument from pet00920 prior to finishing the surgery.The complainant explicitly states that the instrument was jammed after implant insertion.There is no direct connection between usage of pet00920 and any implant, that would explain the delay of surgery by trying to disconnect the the jammed pet00920.
|
|
No patient information was provided by the complainant.No further remedial action/ corrective action/ preventive action/ field safety corrective action is required, as it is questionable why the surgeon spend extra effort to disconnect the instrument from pet00920 prior to finishing the surgery.The complainant explicitly states that the instrument was jammed after implant insertion.There is no direct connection between usage of pet00920 and any implant, that would explain the delay of surgery by trying to disconnect the jammed pet00920.Eit emerging implant technologies gmbh (eit) is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which eit has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, eit or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, eit, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Capa (b)(4) driven by an audit, performed by the parent company johnson & johnson, it was evaluated that the complaint/incident on hand needs to be reported retrospectively.
|