|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device and no non-conformances were identified.Additional evaluation summary: representative samples were received for evaluation.The representative samples of product code z495 were examined for visual defects.The packets were opened and during the visual inspection the needles/sutures were correctly placed on the winding former.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no defects, damaged or were observed.According to the samples condition, the assignable cause cannot be determined since no defects were observed on the packet or the suture.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: what tissue layer was the suture used on? the pds was placed in the retro-auricular skin layer during closure of a face-lift.What was the condition of the tissue (healthy, diseased, fragile, weakened)? the tissue was healthy prior to surgery.How was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? the placement of sutures was interrupted.Did the patient exhibit any signs of infection prior to the procedure? no signs of infection prior to procedure.Were any cultures taken of the wound? what are the results? cultures were taken showed staph aureus.Can you describe the appearance of the suture during the second procedure? during the second procedures the sutures were intact.What is the surgeon opinion as to the relationship of the pds ii suture and the patient fever and infection? i don't have an opinion just investigating.What was the indication for removing the suture during second procedure? sutures had to be removed to evacuate purulent.What are the patient age, gender, weight, bmi, past medical history? patient is a (b)(6) female , (b)(6), pmhx of breast cancer on tamoxifen.What is the status of the device samples for return lot mlz449? returned the entire box.What is the current condition of the patient? wound is stable but still erythematous.
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a face lift surgery on (b)(6) 2019 and suture was used.The suture was placed in the retro-auricular skin layer during closure of a face-lift surgery.The placement of sutures was interrupted.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient returned to the doctor, complaining of a fever and infection along the incision line.The doctor prescribed antibiotics and released the patient.The patient returned on (b)(6) 2019, reporting the infection has gotten worse.There were no signs of infection prior to procedure.Cultures were taken and showed staph aureus.The doctor reoperated, removed the suture, irrigated the incision line and resutured the incision with a different suture.The patient is stable and has been treated with ten days of oral bactrim.The wound is stable but still erythematous.Additional information has been requested.
|