|
The suspect devices, hps-cb06 (qty 2), will not be returned for evaluation and no photographic evidence has been provided.Therefore, the reported failure cannot be verified.Four unused devices from the same lot number were returned for evaluation.Examination was performed and could not find any defects or evidence of the spring detached from the inner hub.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use (handpiece), the user is advised the following: warnings: do not use burs for plunge cutting.Injury or damage may occur.Do not use shaver blade or bur if they show any signs of damage.Precautions: do not apply excessive loading on the shaver blade or bur.Cutting performance is not increased with force.Excessive force or using shaver blades or burs as a lever can cause damage to the device including permanent deformation, shedding of metal (wear), motor seizure, and overheating.If shaver blade clogs, use conmed livatec declogger to declog shaver blade.Shaver blades or burs may also be declogged by removing the inner assembly of the shaver blade from the outer assembly and clearing any tissue from the window or aspiration hole.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
|
The sales representative reported on behalf of the customer that the hps-cb06, 4.2mm x 19cm hps prebent gator concave, device was being used during a hip labral reconstruction procedure on (b)(6) 2019 when tissue became stuck in the device.The surgeon gave the device to the physician's assistant who is reported as "pulling on the tissue for its removal" when the inner shaft of the blade came out.This caused a 2-minute delay in the procedure.The user then alleged that the spring was disengaged and not connected as it should be in the device.There was no loss of components or fragmentation.There was no report of injury to the user or the patient.And the procedure is reported as having been completed successfully.There have been no previous reportings for this device and failure mode.This report is being raised on the basis of malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|