|
It was reported that during a transvascular interventional therapy procedure, the physician advanced the mira-flex microcatheter into the supplying vessels of the tumor along the microwire guide.When injecting the contrast agent, the physician found the white tip of the microcatheter was detached from hub.The physician removed the microcatheter and changed to a similar device to successfully complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), quality control, and specifications of the device, as well as a visual inspection, dimensional verification, and supplier investigation, were conducted during the investigation.The complainant returned one catheter assembly with the proximal hub was separated from the catheter tubing.Dimensional analysis confirmed the device was within the correct specifications and tolerances.The strain relief was removed from the hub to further observe the interior.No damage or dried adhesive was observed on the hub, but it was observed throughout the entire interior of the strain relief.A supplier investigation was initiated in response to the complaint.The supplier reviewed device images provided by cook and the device history record for the device lot, and 10 lots manufactured prior to the lot.It was concluded that all tested tensile strength values measured at the beginning and end of shifts passed the accepted values per their external and internal specifications.Therefore, no additional actions were taken in response to the incidents.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed for lot 9241787.There have been no relevant reported nonconformances for this lot.A software search revealed no other complaints have been reported for the complaint lot.It was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.Based on the information provided, inspection of returned product and the results of the investigation, a definitive cause could not be established.Appropriate measures are being conducted have been taken to address this failure mode.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|