|
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and inspected.The complaint can be confirmed.The device was received broken in two pieces at the weld point where the handle meets the shaft.The laser lines of the device were heavily faded.The device is reusable, and no lot number is physically present on the device suggesting that it is at least 4 years old per the revision history of the drawing.This type of failure is typically observed after the device has been reprocessed over the course of many years therefore causing the weld integrity to degrade.However, given the information provided we cannot discern a definitive root cause for the reported failure.No lot numbers were supplied which precludes conducting a device history record (dhr) review.At this point, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).The lot number is unknown.
|