• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS SYMBOTEX; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS SYMBOTEX; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number SYM20
Medical Device Problem Codes Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Abdominal Pain (1685); Adhesion(s) (1695); Purulent Discharge (1812); Failure of Implant (1924); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Ascites (2596); No Code Available (3191); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Date of Event 03/11/2019
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during an abdominal hernia procedure, there was a hole blown out in the center of the mesh.A second surgery was done laparoscopically.The mesh that failed was unable to be removed and a new piece of mesh was placed over the top of it.The patient had an acute small bowel obstruction which required an emergency surgery.A tacker and sutures were used for both surgeries.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
A healthcare professional reported that after an abdominal hernia procedure, there was central mesh failure with a hole in the center of the mesh.A second laparoscopic procedure was performed where the mesh could not be removed and a new piece of mesh was placed over the top.A tacker and sutures were used for both surgeries.The patient also had an acute small bowel obstruction requiring emergency surgery.The patient added that after implant of the mesh, they experienced pain and adhesions.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device, during an abdominal hernia procedure, there was a hole blown out in the center of the mesh.A second surgery was done laparoscopically.The mesh that failed was unable to be removed and a new piece of mesh was placed over the top of it.The patient had an acute small bowel obstruction which required an emergency surgery.A tacker and sutures were used for both surgeries.The patient experienced pain.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an abdominal hernia.It was reported that after the implant, the patient experienced recurrence, pain, small bowel obstruction, abdominal pain, defect in mesh, free fluid, inflammatory changes in some murky fluid, adhesions, and mesh failure.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, recurrence repair and excision of mesh.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Additional information: a2 (dob), b5, d7, g3, g4, h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an abdominal hernia.It was reported that after the implant, the patient experienced recurrence, pain, small bowel obstruction, adhesions, and mesh failure.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery and excision of mesh.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, b6, b7, d8, g3, h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for laparoscopic therapeutic treatment of an incisional hernia.It was reported that after the implant, the patient experienced recurrence through mesh, pain, small bowel obstruction, abdominal pain, defect in mesh, free fluid, inflammatory changes in some murky fluid, adhesions, and mesh failure.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, recurrence repair, lysis of adhesions, hernia sac excised, mesh revision/closed transversely, and excision of mesh.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYMBOTEX
Common Device Name
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
MDR Report Key8484897
Report Number9615742-2019-00998
Device Sequence Number13956945
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier10884521593435
UDI-Public10884521593435
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142908
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2019
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,consum
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/12/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2021
Device Model NumberSYM20
Device Catalogue NumberSYM20
Device Lot NumberPQG0177X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/17/2019
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/12/2019
07/10/2019
07/24/2019
06/19/2019
06/19/2019
01/27/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/04/2019
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/11/2019
07/16/2019
08/12/2019
01/16/2020
01/27/2020
02/12/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
-
-