The associated complaint device was not returned.The clinical/medical team concluded, the clinical information provided, (b)(6)) the elevated metal ion levels, synovitis and staining may be consistent with a reaction to metal debris.However the source cannot be determined with the available documentation.Also, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The components revised were the bhr resurfacing, the r3 liner and r# shell.In conclusion, for (b)(6) the root cause of the dislocations cannot be concluded, however the mixture of components during the 1st right revision with different manufacturers could have contributed to the issue.It is noted that no x-rays copies or components were returned for this investigation.Patient impact except for the surgeries cannot be predicted and a follow-up status has not been provided at this time.A review of the production documentation for the corresponding products did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.A review of complaint history for the listed part revealed no prior complaints for the listed batch.Without the actual device involved our investigation cannot proceed.If the device or new information is received in the future, the complaints can be re-opened.No further actions are being taken at this time.
|