| Catalog Number |
112230 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Non Reproducible Results (4029)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
03/22/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As part of the normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Pelvic array's lower peg had it's visadisc allowed to be too lose/coming free with impaction.Dr.Was happy with his cup placement and rest of the case but did not believe the leg length numbers to be totally accurate.Case type: tha.What is the estimated discrepancy in accuracy regarding the leg length numbers? can you quantify the gap in length? was there a discrepancy between planned vs outcome? as per the mps: the dr.Was content with the placement of the cup and did not work about his length/offset numbers.I could check what the planned outcome was on monday 4/1, but i don't have any real data for you on how much of a discrepancy there was.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Follow-up #1 and final report submitted to update sections d.3, g.1, g.4, g.7, h.2, h.3, h.6, h.10 and h.11 based on the results of investigation.Reported event: it was reported that pelvic array's lower peg had it's vizadisc allowed to be too lose/coming free with impaction.Dr.Was happy with his cup placement and rest of the case but did not believe the leg length numbers to be totally accurate.Product evaluation and results: product inspection could not be performed as the product was not available for evaluation.Product history review: a review of the device history records indicate 50 devices were manufactured under lot 19031117 and were accepted into final stock on 01/12/2018.No non-conformance were identified during inspection.Complaint history review: a review of complaints in catsweb and trackwise related to p/n 112230, lot 19031117, shows no additional complaint related to the failure in this investigation.Conclusions: the failure mode could not be confirmed because the part was not available for evaluation.If device and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.Corrective action/preventive action : no action is required at this time as there is no indication to suggest a product non-conformity or unanticipated hazard.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Pelvic array's lower peg had it's visadisc allowed to be too lose/coming free with impaction.Dr.Was happy with his cup placement and rest of the case but did not believe the leg length numbers to be totally accurate.Case type: tha.1.What is the estimated discrepancy in accuracy regarding the leg length numbers? 2.Can you quantify the gap in length? 3.Was there a discrepancy between planned vs outcome? as per the mps: the dr.Was content with the placement of the cup and did not work about his length/offset numbers.I could check what the planned outcome was on monday 4/1, but i don't have any real data for you on how much of a discrepancy there was.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|