| Catalog Number |
136552100 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Naturally Worn (2988); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Tissue Damage (2104); Discomfort (2330); Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint (2671); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
11/26/2011
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.(b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.Based on previous investigations this complication of joint replacement is unlikely to have been the result of a device failing to meet required specifications.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Corrective action was not indicated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Pfs alleges pain, metallosis, tendonitis and walking difficulty.After review of medical records, the patient was revised to address pain and metallosis.Revision notes reported a metallosis-induced inflamed joint fluid and scar tissues in the pseudocapsule area.The aspirated fluid from the hip was negative for infection and the appearance was more consistent with metal reactivity.Metal ion levels were below 7ppb.Doi: (b)(6) 2010 - dor: (b)(6) 2011, (right hip).Update rec'd 10/15/2014 - litigation papers received.In addition to what was previously reported, litigation alleges the patient suffers from pain, discomfort, and toxic cobalt-chromium metal ions and particles to be released into the blood, tissue and bone.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary = > no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch , a follow-up medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Per internal procedures, the event information and any investigational inputs received as part of required follow up were reviewed.For this investigation, no immediate action was required as no alleged deficiency with the device was identified.Monitor ¿ hip implant ¿ mom bearing couple.No device associated with this report was received for examination.The alleged adverse symptoms, and the product code reported, are associated with the articulation between depuy metal-on-metal products.Per (b)(4), it has been determined that should additional reports be identified for related metal-on-metal complications, a device history record (dhr) review is not required.Therefore, a complaint database search and/or device manufacturing review will not be performed for the reported product associated with this investigation.Investigational inputs were requested as indicated per internal procedures for this failure mode.The complaint information provided has been reviewed for complaint coding, medical device reporting, and other data required by the complaint system.Follow-up for additional event information, if applicable, was conducted utilizing work instruction (b)(4) appendix a.Without the physical complaint sample associated with this report, it was not possible to determine if the device failed to meet specifications at the time it was released for distribution.The device associated with this event was used in the treatment of the patient as prescribed by the presiding surgeon.From the event information received, it was not possible to determine the relationship of the device to the reported event.No evidence was found indicating product error was a contributing factor.The need for corrective action was not indicated.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional info be received, the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : null.Device history batch : null.Device history review : null.Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report. added b5 and h6 (patient and device code).Corrected a1 and d7.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Ppf alleges metal wear.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|