|
Weight, ethnicity, race: customer did not provide patient demographics such as date of birth, weight, ethnicity or race.Device evaluated by mfr: the access total ¿hcg reagent was not returned for evaluation.A beckman coulter (bec) field service engineer (fse) was not dispatched to the customer's site.No issues with sample integrity were reported by the customer.Qc was passing within the laboratory¿s established ranges.No hardware errors or other assay issues were reported in conjunction with this event.One (1) patient sample was sent to beckman coulter for investigation.The customer result was confirmed in testing.Interference testing, using different blockers, was then carried out.This interference testing demonstrated the presence of interfering substances.In conclusion, the investigation demonstrated that an interference is the cause of the falsely elevated hcg5 results.Per the total ¿hcg instructions for use (ifu), par number (pn) b15025 e, it states: "for assays employing antibodies, the possibility exists for interference by heterophile antibodies in the patient sample.Patients who have been regularly exposed to animals or have received immunotherapy or diagnostic procedures utilizing immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin fragments may produce antibodies, e.G.Hama, that interfere with immunoassays.Additionally, other heterophile antibodies such as human anti-goat antibodies may be present in patient samples.Such interfering antibodies may cause erroneous results.Carefully evaluate the results of patients suspected of having these antibodies.Other potential interferences in the patient sample could be present and may cause erroneous results in immunoassays.Some examples that have been documented in literature include rheumatoid factor, endogenous alkaline phosphatase, fibrin, and proteins capable of binding to alkaline phosphatase.Carefully evaluate the results of patients suspected of having these types of interferences.".
|