Device was used for treatment and not for diagnosis.On (b)(6) 2019, medcad contacted the initial reporter via email requesting additional information about the events described, including a request for the patient's weight.The initial reporter communicated via phone that the device was implanted on (b)(6) 2018 and explanted on (b)(6) 2019.The operating surgeon communicated via email that the patient had a history of prior infection, and that the implant was removed following erosion that the patient experienced away from any prominence in the cranioplasty plate.The surgeon communicated that he does not believe that the implant is the cause for the conditions experienced by the patient.Review of production records showed that the device was manufactured in conformance with internal requirements.No nonconformance was identified during production of this implant.Investigation did not identify any device-related problems.After requests from medcad on march 11, 2019 and (b)(6) 2019, the initial reporter was unable to provide the patient's weight.
|
On march 11, 2019, a distributor sales representative notified medcad that the accushape peek patient-specific cranial implant was removed from the patient on (b)(6) 2019, after the patient experienced an infection.
|