| Model Number |
CRUS6A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
For the three reported events, the two devices were returned to bd and evaluated and one was not returned to bd.The company is still investigating the issue at this time.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report summarizes three malfunction events.A review of the events indicated that model crus6a recanalization catheter allegedly the distal tip of the catheter was detached.These reports were received from various sources.Of the one events, did not involve patients, and two involved patients with no reported patient injury.Two patients' age ranged from 66-76 years and one patient's weight was (b)(6) lbs.All other patient age and weight were not provided.One was male and one was female.All other patient gender were not provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report summarizes three malfunction events.A review of the events indicated that model crus6a recanalization catheter allegedly the distal tip of the catheter was detached.These reports were received from various sources.Of the one events, did not involve patients, and two involved patients with no reported patient injury.Two patients' age ranged from 66-76 years and one patient's weight was 192 lbs.All other patient age and weight were not provided.One was male and one was female.All other patient gender were not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: three lot numbers were provided and lot history reviews were performed.Of the three reported malfunctions, two devices were returned for evaluation.One was confirmed for tip detachment while the other was confirmed for material twisted and unconfirmed for tip detachment.The device that was not returned is inconclusive for tip detachment.A root cause has not been determined.The devices were labeled for single use.H11: h6 (results, conclusion), h6 (device code + description) 2981 material twisted.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
3 lot numbers were provided, and lot history reviews were performed.Of the 3 reported malfunctions, 2 devices were returned for evaluation.1 device was confirmed for a detachment.1 device is still pending evaluation.The company is still investigating the issue at this time.The device that was not returned is inconclusive for detachment.A root cause has not been determined.The devices were labeled for single use.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report summarizes three malfunction events.A review of the events indicated that model crus6a recanalization catheter allegedly the distal tip of the catheter was detached.These reports were received from various sources.Of the one events, did not involve patients, and two involved patients with no reported patient injury.Two patients' age ranged from 66-76 years and one patient's weight was 192 lbs.All other patient age and weight were not provided.One was male and one was female.All other patient gender were not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: three lot numbers were provided and lot history reviews were performed.Of the three reported malfunctions, two devices were returned for evaluation.One was confirmed for tip detachment while the other was confirmed for material twisted and unconfirmed for tip detachment.The device that was not returned is inconclusive for tip detachment.A root cause has not been determined.The devices were labeled for single use.Of the 3 reported malfunctions, 1 were reassessed for reportability and determined to be no longer reportable.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This report summarizes three malfunction events.A review of the events indicated that model crus6a recanalization catheter allegedly the distal tip of the catheter was detached.These reports were received from various sources.Of the one events, did not involve patients, and two involved patients with no reported patient injury.Two patients' age ranged from 66-76 years and one patient's weight was 192 lbs.All other patient age and weight were not provided.One was male and one was female.All other patient gender were not provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|