|
It was reported that during the exploratory surgery due to discomfort in patient's throat, the locking mechanism of the plate was found to be broken and caused laceration to the esophagus muscle which in turn had to be sewn closed.The broken plate was replaced.This process resulted in significant surgical delay.However, the exact duration of the surgical delay was not reported.
|
|
It was reported that the plate securing mechanism was found deformed/fractured at c7 level.The revision surgery was extended an additional hour due to the need to close the membrane surrounding the esophagus.The patient was required to have a feeding tube for a period of time; duration not reported.The revision surgery was completed successfully with a different brand cervical plate.There were no complications during the initial surgery.It was confirmed that the screws were positioned below the spring bar and the plate¿s locking mechanism was in the locked position.Screw holes were prepared with variable awl and were implanted at a difficult angle.Patient was reported to have good bone purchase, did not do any strenuous activity, nor experienced a fall.
|
|
Visual inspection for 6 screws were returned.Four self-drilling 4x16mm screw and two self-drilling 4x16 screws.Two screws migrated post-op and the remaining screws are concomitant and were returned for archiving.Some scratches and discoloration was noticed on the screws most likely due to implantation/explanation.No other anomalies were noticed.Materials analysis was not performed as the event is not related to the material properties of the implants.Functional and dimensional analysis was not performed.The implants were used in vivo and are one time use.Per what was reported, screw pathway was prepared as per the stg and it was confirmed that the screws were locked.The bone quality was good, no patient falls, and operative notes/medical history of the patient is not available.The root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.Potential root causes: improper plate sizing or contouring.Excessive post-op activity by patient (not recommended by surgeon).Previous revision surgeries / acdf procedures intra-operative dissections (could have cause a tear from a previous surgery to sensitive anatomy/soft tissue).Patient does not follow surgeon instructions.Patient over exerts.The surgical technique states: ¿use of the screw hole preparation instruments including the fixed or variable drill guides, all-in-one drill guides or punch awl with sleeves is required to place screws in the proper trajectory, help prevent damage to implants, difficulty locking the blocker, or locking mechanism malfunction.Patients involved in an occupation or activity which applies inordinate stress upon the implant (e.G., substantial walking, running, lifting, or muscle strain) may be at increased risk for failure of the fusion and/or the device.Surgeons must instruct patients in detail about the limitations of the implants, including, but not limited to, the impact of excessive loading through patient weight or activity, and be taught to govern their activities accordingly.The procedure will not restore function to the level expected with a normal, healthy spine, and surgeons should counsel patient to not have unrealistic functional expectations.Patients who smoke have been shown to have an increased incidence of non-unions.Such patients must be advised of this fact and warned of the potential consequences.".
|