|
The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, a blade guide sleeve for trochanteric fixation nail did not allow the trocars and helical blade inserters to easily pass through it.The device had been inspected and replaced.It is unknown if there was procedure or patient involvement.Concomitant device reported: unknown - insertion instruments: trocar: tr(part#unknown, lot#unknown, quantity#unknown); unknown helical blade inserters (part#unknown, lot#unknown, quantity#unknown).This report is for one (1) blade guide sleeve for trochanteric fixation nails.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6: device history lot: part # 357.369.Synthes lot # 9831690.Supplier lot # 9831690.Release to warehouse date: 13 jan 2016.Supplier: (b)(4).(b)(4) was generated during routine inspection for no vendor inspection data.This non-conformance is not relevant to the complaint condition since the nc was reviewed and confirmed to be non-valid as of 04 jan 2016.Device history batch null, device history review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Background: it was reported that on an unknown date a blade guide sleeve for trochanteric fixation nail is no longer allowing trocars and helical blade inserters to easily pass through it.There was not a specific case that the hospital reported with this malfunction.The device had been inspected and it needed to be replaced.It is unknown if there were a procedure and patient involvement.Concomitant device reported: unknown - insertion instruments: trocar: tr (part#unknown, lot#unknown, quantity#unknown); unknown helical blade inserters (part#unknown, lot#unknown, quantity#unknown) this complaint involves one (1) device.H3, h6: investigation flow: device interaction/ functional.Visual inspection: the blade guide sleeve for trochanteric fixation nails (part # 357.369, lot # 9831690) was received at us cq.There is some deformation can be seen on some of the external threads of the blade guide sleeve.A normal wear of the internal surface of the blade guide sleeve due to consistent use of the device.Functional test: functional test of the blade guide sleeve for trochanteric fixation nails cannot be performed because the other components required for functional test of the blade guide sleeve were not returned.Dimensional inspection: dimensional analysis was completed, the threaded shaft diameter was measured and is within specification.The internal diameter of the blade guide sleeve was measured and is within specification.Document/specification review: the following drawing(s) was reviewed; -blade guide sleeve trochanteric fixation nail: 357_369 rev.G and rev.H.Investigation conclusion: visual inspection of the received device, dimensional inspection and document specification review were performed at cq.The worn out internal surfaces might have contributed to the present complaint condition.Thus, the complaint is confirmed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is possible that the device encountered repeated use consistently.No new malfunctions were observed during this investigation.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|