• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS MESH SOFRADIM - PARIETEX¿ COMPOSITE MESH; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS MESH SOFRADIM - PARIETEX¿ COMPOSITE MESH; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number PCO2520OS
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Erosion (1750); Cellulitis (1768); Dehydration (1807); Erythema (1840); Fever (1858); Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932); Nausea (1970); Pain (1994); Seroma (2069); Tissue Damage (2104); Vomiting (2144); Chills (2191); Discharge (2225); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Impaired Healing (2378); Ascites (2596); Fluid Discharge (2686); No Code Available (3191); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent ventral hernia repaired with new mesh, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, small liver injury left lobe with lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, small bowel resected from mesh, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen and chronic draining sinus tract.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, infection, seroma, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, adhesions, small liver injury left lobe, chronic draining sinus tract, open wound, abscess.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, excision of mesh, hernia repair with mesh, incision and drainage of abdominal wall seroma with visible previously placed ventral hernia repair mesh, vac dressing, lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, small bowel resected from mesh.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent ventral hernia repaired with new mesh, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, small liver injury left lobe with lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, small bowel resected from mesh, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen and chronic draining sinus tract.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, infection, seroma, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, foreign body reaction, adhesions, small liver injury left lobe, chronic draining sinus tract, open wound, abscess, fever, chills, abdominal pain.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, excision of mesh, hernia repair with mesh, incision and drainage of abdominal wall seroma with visible previously placed ventral hernia repair mesh, vac dressing, lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, small bowel resected from mesh.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, infection, seroma, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, foreign body reaction, adhesions, small liver injury left lobe, chronic draining sinus tract, open wound, abscess, fever, chills, pain, mesh erosion, mesh migration, and abdominal pain.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, excision of mesh, hernia repair with mesh, incision and drainage of abdominal wall seroma with visible previously placed ventral hernia repair mesh, vac dressing, lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, small bowel resected from mesh.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient codes - e2402 (sinus tract).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, infection, seroma, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, foreign body reaction, adhesions, small liver injury left lobe, chronic draining sinus tract, open wound, abscess, fever, chills, pain, mesh erosion, mesh migration, organ damage, and abdominal pain.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, excision of mesh, hernia repair with mesh, incision and drainage of abdominal wall seroma with visible previously placed ventral hernia repair mesh, vac dressing, lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, medication, and small bowel resected from mesh.Relevant tests/laboratory data: (b)(6) 2013-surgical pathology report-mesh from abdominal ventral hernia repair showing surgical mesh and fibrofatty tissue with patchy mild chronic inflammation and foreign body reaction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: ime 2402: sinus tract, fibrofatty tissue, metabolic acidosis, dehydration.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a recurrent abdominal wall ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, infection, seroma, dense inflammatory reaction within the abdomen, foreign body reaction, adhesions, small liver injury left lobe, chronic draining sinus tract, open wound, abscess, fever, chills, pain, mesh erosion, mesh migration, organ damage, fluid collection, cellulitis, fibrofatty tissue, redness, nausea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic acidosis, and abdominal pain.Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, excision of mesh, hernia repair with mesh, incision and drainage of abdominal wall seroma with visible previously placed ventral hernia repair mesh, vac dressing, lysis of adhesions, debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue from abdominal wall, medication, ct scan, hospitalization, potassium repletion, pigtail catheter, and small bowel resected from mesh.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH SOFRADIM - PARIETEX¿ COMPOSITE MESH
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
Manufacturer (Section G)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR   01600
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
5920 longbow drive
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view,mn, CO 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key8507388
MDR Text Key141720574
Report Number9615742-2019-01240
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K050187
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/11/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2010
Device Model NumberPCO2520OS
Device Catalogue NumberPCO2520OS
Device Lot NumberPFF00299
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/14/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight98 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-