| Catalog Number |
0134810 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Purulent Discharge (1812); Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
06/28/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery with implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2010.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery with implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2010.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.As reported, the attorney alleges product is defective and that the patient experienced emotional distress.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix l/p mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia defect was identified and reduced.The adhesions were lysed.A composix l/p mesh (device #1) was placed and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions were lysed.The hernia defect was identified and repaired with synthetic mesh.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with bowel obstruction and incarcerated recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of xenmatrix mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified and opened.All the adhesions of omentum, bowel and hernia sac were taken down.The old mesh was well intact.A xenmatrix mesh (device #2) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with seroma and murky fluid extruding thereby underwent open repair with excision of composix l/p mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿the tissue pocket with murky fluid with yellow fibrinous material was identified and suctioned.The old mesh was removed completely.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2008) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|