Catalog Number 385100 |
Device Problems
Crack (1135); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/26/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation and/or device history review, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use of the bd q-syte¿ luer access split-septum stand-alone device the connector was placed about 5 days, the q-syte connector was quite difficult to be removed in preparation of injection.The connector was cracked after removed by force.The injected medicine were liver serax and eddie.Foreign complaint the following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from chinese to english: the connector was placed about 5 days, the q-syte connector was quite difficult to be removed in preparation of injection.The connector was cracked after removed by force.The injected medicine were liver serax and eddie.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use of the bd q-syte¿ luer access split-septum stand-alone device the connector was placed about 5 days, the q-syte connector was quite difficult to be removed in preparation of injection.The connector was cracked after removed by force.The injected medicine were liver serax and eddie.Foreign complaint the following information was provided by the initial reporter, translated from chinese to english: the connector was placed about 5 days, the q-syte connector was quite difficult to be removed in preparation of injection.The connector was cracked after removed by force.The injected medicine were liver serax and eddie.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H.6.Investigation: bd received a q-syte unit from lot 8115557 for evaluation.A review of the device history record was performed for the reported lot and no quality issues were found during production.Our quality engineer visually inspected the returned unit and observed that the top and bottom bodies were separated at the weld joint location.The septum and neck of the top body was separated from the rest of the body.However, there was adequate traces of a weld line on the rims of the top and bottom bodies to show that a weld was made during production.Also, the bottom half of the top body was cracked.The engineer was unable to verify the reported issue of the q-syte being difficult to remove however, the engineer was able to verify that the unit was damaged and in three separate pieces.There was no physical or mechanical evidence to confirm or support the manufacturing process as the cause of this issue.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|