Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control were conducted during the investigation.Cook did not receive a device for investigation from the complainant.Cook has not received any related complaints with the same failure mode where the device was returned for investigation, so no past device investigation could be reference.At this time, there is no evidence suggesting that the device was manufactured out of specification.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.Cook completed a review of the product device master record and has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Cook also completed a review of the device history record and found no nonconformances relevant to the failure mode on either the supplied final set lots, the wire component lots, or any additional final set lots that include the wire component lots.No devices from the supplied final set lots were able to be pulled from the distribution center for further testing, and a software search for complaints on all final lots consisting of the wire component lots found no additional complaints from the field.From this information, there is no evidence suggesting that there is nonconforming product in house or in the field.Based on the information provided, no inspection of returned product and the results of the investigation, a definitive cause could be established.Cook concluded that component failure, without design or manufacturing issue, contributed to the incident.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
|
It was reported in additional information received on 24apr2019 that there was concern from the physician that the wire had caused the patient to bleed.The physician though that that dilator did not go well over the wire.The procedure was completed.The patient passed away a couple of days ago due to massive injuries from a trauma.No additional procedure was required and no further events have been reported to the endoscopy manager.In additional information received on 20may2019 reported that, the patient arrived on (b)(6)2019 as a result of a motorcycle vs.Vehicle accident.The patient was put on ecmo and a tracheostomy was performed.Heparin was administered.Bleeding in the lung was discovered on (b)(6) 2019 by pulmonology.A 9fr arndt blocker was used and collapsed the lung.This stopped the bleed in the lung and the patient became stable.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient died as a result of the injuries sustained from the accident with the vehicle.It was reported that the wire felt more stiff as usual and dilation was difficult during the tracheostomy procedure.The flexible end of the wire was inserted into the patient.No autopsy report, x-rays or death certificate will be available.A bronchoscope was used during the procedure.The lot number of the device used during the procedure could not be confirmed.
|