|
The reported event could be confirmed.The device inspection revealed the following: visual inspection: we received a humeral nail t2 humerus ø8x250 mm for evaluation.It was returned in an assembled mode with corresponding compression screw.The implants are marked with signs of implantation and explantation.Functional inspection: the functional test revealed that within the nail the compression screw in question could be completely inserted like specified.Dimensional inspection: dimensional examination of the compression screw revealed no deviations in the relevant undamaged areas.The root cause could not be determined.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Ifu points out as following: ¿adverse effects in many instances, adverse results may be clinically related rather than device related.The following are the most frequent adverse effects involving the use of internal fracture fixation devices: ¿ delayed union or non-union of the fracture site.¿ these devices can break when subjected to the increased loading associated with delayed unions and/or non-unions.Internal fixation devices are load sharing devices which are intended to hold fractured bone surfaces in apposition to facilitate healing.If healing is delayed or does not occur, the appliance may eventually break due to metal fatigue.Loads on the device produced by load bearing and the patient's activity level will dictate the longevity of the device.¿ conditions attributable to non-union, osteoporosis, osteomalicia, diabetes, inhibited revascularization and poor bone formation can cause loosening, bending, cracking, fracture of the device or premature loss of rigid fixation with the bone.¿ improper alignment can cause a mal-union of the bone and/or bending, cracking or even breakage of the device.¿.
|