|
Occupation: initial reporter is synthes sales representative.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) procedure due to collapse on the disc space on (b)(6) 2019, the tip of the long locking retaining sleeve was broken after an unknown screw was inserted upon checking on an x-ray.The broken fragment was seen on the screw head but was easily removed.The procedure was successfully completed with no surgical delay.Patient condition was unknown.Concomitant device reported: unknown screw (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity unknown).This report is for one (1) locking holding sleeve-long for matrix.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: retain-sleeve locking long (part# 03.616.043, lot # 6995994) was received.Upon visual inspection, it is observed that a tip of the distal thread broken off and some fragments of the broken part were returned.Thus, the complaint is confirmed.Dimensional inspection cannot be performed due to post manufacturing damage.The raw material was confirmed to be correct per the specification with no (relevant) non-conformance noted.A visual inspection and document/specification review were performed as part of this investigation.The part of the distal threads of the complaint device were observed to be broken off, thus confirming the complaint.While a definitive root cause could not be identified, it is possible that the rough handling of the device could have contributed to the complaint condition.No product design or manufacturing issues were identified, and no new malfunctions were identified either.Based upon these results, no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: part # 03.616.043.Synthes lot # 6995994.Supplier lot # 6995994.Release to warehouse date: (b)(6) 2013.Supplier: (b)(4).Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|