• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HD SYS. CDX W/BIBAG BLUE STAR; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HD SYS. CDX W/BIBAG BLUE STAR; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 191126
Device Problems Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071); Fire (1245); Smoking (1585)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/19/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
 
Event Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported a fresenius 2008t hemodialysis (hd) machine with a power plug that was observed with visible flame and smoking coming from it.It was confirmed the issued occurred while a patient was being treated on the machine, and it was confirmed the patient¿s blood was manually rinsed backed, and there was no blood lost.The smoke detectors at the clinic went off, and the clinic suite was evacuated.It was confirmed the machine had approximately 200 hours of use on it, and the power plug was the original fresenius part on the machine.The biomed confirmed the outlets at the clinic are not gfci outlets.It was confirmed that there was no damage to any other components on the machine.The biomed reported they were waiting on a replacement power supply to resolve the issue and return the machine to service.The power plug was reportedly returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Additional information was requested, but was not provided.If additional information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius regional equipment specialist (res).A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the device was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.The power supply was received with the power cable cut.The power plug was not returned.An inspection on the power supply found the heater cable missing.Wires from capacitor (c1) were found to be unplugged from the power control board and the ground wire was not connected to the ground post of the power supply.There are no other discrepancies found during the initial inspection.A continuity check on the ground, neutral, and hot wires of the cut power cable found no discrepancies.A known-good power cable and heater cable were installed onto the power supply and the power supply was installed onto a test machine for testing.The machine powered on without alarms or failures.No damage occurred to the returned power supply and power cable during power up.The test machine completed a rinse program without damage to the returned power supply and cable.The test machine completed a heat disinfect program without damage to the returned power supply and power cable.The test machine was monitored in dialysis mode for 1 hour without discrepancies on the returned power supply and power cable.The machine passed the self-test program.The returned power supply functioned properly during testing.A review of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no deviations or non-conformances during the manufacturing process.In addition, a device history record (dhr) review was performed and verified that the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.A review of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no deviations or non-conformances during the manufacturing process.In addition, a device history record (dhr) review was performed and verified that the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2008T HD SYS. CDX W/BIBAG BLUE STAR
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONCORD MANUFACTURING
4040 nelson avenue
concord CA 94520
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONCORD MANUFACTURING
director, quality systems
4040 nelson avenue
concord CA 94520
Manufacturer Contact
matthew amaral
920 winter st.
waltham, MA 02451
7816999758
MDR Report Key8568094
MDR Text Key143652293
Report Number2937457-2019-01271
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861102099
UDI-Public00840861102099
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173972
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/01/2019
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number191126
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/11/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device Age MO
Date Manufacturer Received06/12/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/28/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-