|
Reported event: an event regarding pain and high cobalt levels involving a dall miles cable was reported.The event was confirmed through review of the provided medical records.Method & results: device evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however an intra-operative photograph of the dall miles cable was provided for review.The photograph shows clearly shows the proximal dm-cable is very ¿shiny¿, or ¿polished¿ in-situ wrapped around the proximal part of the femur.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records and/or x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: movement between a dm-cable and underlying soft tissues has gradually but persistently contributed to local metallic debris generation with local tissue metallosis and elevated blood cobalt levels requiring revision where femoral head and liner were exchanged with no complete information available about this second hip revision surgery to allow to further detail the findings.Device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.An intra-operative photograph of the dall miles cable was provided for review.The photograph shows clearly shows the proximal dm-cable is very ¿shiny¿, or ¿polished¿ in-situ wrapped around the proximal part of the femur.Review of the medical records by a clinician has indicated that movement between a dm-cable and underlying soft tissues has gradually but persistently contributed to local metallic debris generation with local tissue metallosis and elevated blood cobalt levels requiring revision where femoral head and liner were exchanged with no complete information available about this second hip revision surgery to allow to further detail the findings.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Device not returned.
|
|
Reported event: an event regarding abnormal ion level involving a dall miles cable was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however an intra-operative photograph of the stem trunnion was provided for review.The photograph shows the stem trunnion with head removed in-situ, the trunnion appears dark in color, however, it cannot be confirmed from the image provided if this is due to shadow, blood, wear or debris.No conclusions can be drawn from the image provided in relation to damage.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: i can confirm that the patient had a primary left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2007 and a first revision on (b)(6) 2007 since i was able to review the operation reports.I can also confirm that the patient did undergo a subsequent revision on (b)(6) 2019 since i was able to review the implant sheets and the intraoperative photos and explanted materials.I was not provided with the operation report for the second revision.I cannot confirm that the patient had elevated cobalt levels since there was no documentation provided for this other than the narration in the summary.Root cause analysis: there are two events that require examination.The first event is the periprosthetic fracture.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.However, based upon the fact that the surgeon broached for a #1 accolade implant and inserted a #2 implant, this leads me to believe that the cause was iatrogenic related to the surgical technique.It is very likely that a nondisplaced fracture occurred at the time of implantation which was unrecognized and then subsequently with weight-bearing over a six week period the fracture became symptomatic and was recognized and subsidence of the implant was noted necessitating revision.Of course trauma could play a role but there was no report of any traumatic event other than pain after a therapy session.I would not assign any causality for this event to the implant itself.The second event is the development of metallosis with alleged elevated cobalt levels.The root cause of this cannot be determined with certainty.The root causes of metallosis with elevated metal ion levels are multifactorial include surgical technique, especially in the preparation of the femoral head and trunnion prior to and upon insertion.In this particular case, no mention was made during the primary procedure or the first revision procedure of any particular preparation of the trunnion and femoral head.Also, possible contributors could be the patient's lifestyle, activity level and bmi, as well as implant factors.Product history review: review of the product history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported relevant discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to pain and high cobalt levels indicated metallosis.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: i can confirm that the patient had a primary left total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2007 and a first revision on (b)(6) 2007 since i was able to review the operation reports.I can also confirm that the patient did undergo a subsequent revision on (b)(6) 2019 since i was able to review the implant sheets and the intraoperative photos and explanted materials.I was not provided with the operation report for the second revision.I cannot confirm that the patient had elevated cobalt levels since there was no documentation provided for this other than the narration in the summary.Root cause analysis: there are two events that require examination.The first event is the periprosthetic fracture.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.However, based upon the fact that the surgeon broached for a #1 accolade implant and inserted a #2 implant, this leads me to believe that the cause was iatrogenic related to the surgical technique.It is very likely that a nondisplaced fracture occurred at the time of implantation which was unrecognized and then subsequently with weight-bearing over a six week period the fracture became symptomatic and was recognized and subsidence of the implant was noted necessitating revision.Of course trauma could play a role but there was no report of any traumatic event other than pain after a therapy session.I would not assign any causality for this event to the implant itself.The second event is the development of metallosis with alleged elevated cobalt levels.The root cause of this cannot be determined with certainty.The root causes of metallosis with elevated metal ion levels are multifactorial include surgical technique, especially in the preparation of the femoral head and trunnion prior to and upon insertion.In this particular case, no mention was made during the primary procedure or the first revision procedure of any particular preparation of the trunnion and femoral head.Also, possible contributors could be the patient's lifestyle, activity level and bmi, as well as implant factors.The reported device was not returned however an intra-operative photograph of the stem trunnion was provided for review.The photograph shows the stem trunnion with head removed in-situ, the trunnion appears dark in color, however, it cannot be confirmed from the image provided if this is due to shadow, blood, wear or debris.No conclusions can be drawn from the image provided in relation to damage.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|