|
(b)(4).Batch r59p2c.Additional information requested: did the device deliver any staples? if yes, were the staples formed properly? if yes, was the staple line complete? did the device cut? if yes, was the cut line complete? if yes, was there any issue with the cut line such as jagged, dull knife, irregular, etc? was there any difficulty opening the device? if yes, how was the device removed from the patient? if yes, did the jaws eventually open? additional information received: the customer stated that the device fired okay the first time, and reload was removed.The issue occurred trying to reload the device for the second time.They could not get the reload into the device.Investigation summary: the analysis results found that one sc45a was received instead of a sc45 device and with no visual non-conformances and one pan was found lodge inside the channel.The pan was removed from the channel and the device was tested for functionality in the articulated position with a test reload.The device fired, cut and formed all the staples as intended.The staple line was complete and the staples were note to have the proper b-formed shape.While no conclusion could be reached as to how the pan became dislodged from the reload, in addition it should be noted that a 100% inspections takes place during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the require specifications; in addition, a sample of the batch is inspected at fgqa.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.
|