|
Device evaluation and results: visual inspection: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs shows a recently explanted ceramic head with black smears on one side as evidence for past dislocations through contact with the shell rim metal.Material analysis, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: conclusion of assessment: a marginally stable hip arthroplasty was present in 2014 with cup malposition in low inclination, mainly due to inappropriate use of a10° offset liner in combination with a slightly short leg in the hip joint due to inadequate reconstruction of femoral head neck length.The marginal stability of the arthroplasty was further compromised after the first hip dislocation associated with a fall of the patient in 2018.This caused rupture of the hip capsule with loss of soft tissue stability in the joint and no prospect of adequate capsular healing due to further recurrent dislocation in short intervals.Recurrent dislocation required revision surgery with exchange of the bearing for an mdm construct with longer femoral head in (b)(6) 2019.Device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been 05 other similar events for the reported lot.(b)(4) relates to crack/fracture, (b)(4) relates to dislocation, incorrect selection and limb length discrepancy for the same device and patient, therefore no further trending is required for this commonality.Conclusion: the investigation concluded that limb length discrepancy was caused by incorrect selection of a 32-mm/+0 femoral head resulting in a slightly short left leg which contributed to the recurrent dislocations which led to this revision surgery.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.Device not returned.
|